Live robot sex chat
The Real Dolls range from ,000 to ,000, but can range up to ,000 with custom orders.
Abyss has fulfilled orders for fantasy dolls with custom skin colors, fangs and elf ears, but it does not create dolls with disfiguring amputations, deformities or scarification.
The primary use of Real Dolls is for sex and companionship, but the company has also made dolls for TV shows including “Nip/Tuck” and “CSI: New York” and the movie “Lars and the Real Girl.”Specially adapted Real Dolls have been used in medical schools for training and the factory regularly works with mastectomy patients to create custom-made prosthetic silicone breasts.
Mc Mullen said he’s always had a desire to push the realism of his products forward into more humanlike interactivity, but the technology didn’t exist until recently.
” This is the doll, whose name is Harmony, that has a robotic head. Realbotix CEO/creative director Matt Mc Mullen stands with the doll, whose name is Harmony, that has a robotic head. Mc Mullen is also the founder of Abyss Creations which makes the Real Doll.
Nonetheless, it’s eerie spending an hour in the company of Mc Mullen’s Harmony prototype. Her eyes move, her eyelids blink, her eyebrows rise, she can turn her head, dip her chin and change facial expressions.
And when the face motor and bluetooth-powered speaker are in “chat” mode, she can talk up a blue streak.
He sees Harmony more as a comforting conversation companion like Apple’s Siri, albeit one capable of having sensual conversations and telling naughty jokes.“The worst thing she can possibly do to you is insult you,” he said, pointing out that Harmony’s arms and legs are jointed and fully poseable but they don’t operate independently — at least not yet.“The whole idea of a sex-capable robot is very contemporary, now and edgy. But Harmony is a sophisticated piece of machinery and her primary design is to carry on conversations,” he said.
And as for the critics who say artificially intelligent sex dolls disturbingly cross the line into a form of female sex slavery, Mc Mullen calls the argument “absurd.” “This is not designed to replace anyone or promote the objectification of women. “Should my toaster be able to refuse to toast my bread?