Alot of fish dating website validating identity error
Daqu (talk) , 17 January 2015 (UTC) The entire features section seems like pretty standard stuff that's not worth mentioning, and seems like more of an advertisement than any kind of important encyclopedic information.I'd remove the whole thing, but I figured it's better to discuss it and see what others think.This article is part of Wiki Project Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web.To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.The section lists specific details about the site's IT technology ("ASP. I think this info is of little interest or concern to the vast majority of readers so I vote that this section is removed.I find the article to be lacking to some degree by not addressing how this site has altered the market.:) i got banned in 30 minutes and i did NOTHING wrong, they just simply erased my profile. Pizza (talk) , 15 January 2010 (UTC) I am re-adding mine because it is an important warning to anyone using plentyoffish.If you don't find it believable (I didn't) just ask anyone who has an account to check their email carefully.
Anyone walking by when the email is opened or previewed can see the password.
Anyone else who is authorized to open, or accidentally forwarded this monthly email sees the password.
Not everyone who has dozens of online accounts uses a different password for each one, so more than one account's security can be compromised.
Jozsefs (talk) , 24 March 2010 (UTC) Ok, so after leaving some time for this to be discussed, I went ahead and removed the Features section of the article, in an effort to reshape the article so that it reads less like an advertisement.
Jozsefs (talk) , 8 April 2010 (UTC) Still needs more reshaping.
Search for alot of fish dating website:
- Jack Sebastian (talk) , 13 August 2010 (UTC)I just added a couple of factual points yesterday (definitely not just "one person's opinion"), and today it has been removed . If this is correct, then apparently he thinks that Wikipedia is his own personal playground to delete facts not to his liking.